Advancing the Practice of CWPPs – Risk Modeling

May 12, 2020

Written by Corrina Marshall

The Forest Stewards Guild has worked with many communities in New Mexico and Colorado to produce Community Wildfire Protection Plans. For those who are unfamiliar with this type of planning document, it is a program that began in 2003, authorized and defined in Title I of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) passed by Congress. The plans are intended to shape wildfire mitigation and planning priorities for communities in the wildland-urban interface. A major goal of the legislation, when passed in 2003, was to convene diverse local stakeholders and interests to make decisions about their mutual concerns over public safety, communication, and natural resource management.

For the initial round of development, many communities were tackling their wildfire problem for the first time and began by defining their local boundaries and formally identifying locations of great risk. With many original plans being severely outdated, the Forest Stewards Guild has worked to update these documents to reflect changes in wildfire risk and community composition. Guild staff identified that clear plans outlining specific risks and locations for mitigation were lacking, and that the analyses completed on wildfire behavior did not capture all risk factors.

The planning process for previous CWPPs, in general, tended to not result in enough action on the ground, failed to engage local community members in the planning process, or analyze the complexity of wildfire risk. For this installment of ATL, we would like to share about our improvements to wildfire risk analysis. This is done by spatial analysis and wildfire behavior modeling based on vegetation data – that part is not new. What we have added to the CWPP process are products like evacuation modeling, post-fire erosion modeling, radiant heat & short- and long-range spotting potential, and treatment suitability analysis. A few examples below show the outputs from these models, a clear indication of where high priority treatments exist.

The model above shows us where evacuation congestion is likely to occur during a wildfire-influenced evacuation event. This can influence emergency response planners in knowing where to direct people, and land managers to better mitigate forest structure in areas where residents could possibly be stuck during a wildfire. Additional analyses show likely amount of time for certain neighborhoods to evacuate, and identify where wildland fuels against roadways will create non-survivable conditions, based upon flame length.

This information in Figure 2 is absolutely vital to this fire protection district to predict where catastrophic wildfire will have the most impact to watersheds and, in the case of this district, drinking water for a major municipality. This informs where wildland vegetation treatment should be prioritized to lessen the impacts of erosion, and if a wildfire is to occur, this can be a guide for prioritizing post-fire actions.

The model in Figure 3 above is based on research done at the University of Alberta, defining radiant heat exposure to structures at 30 meters, short-range ember exposure at 100 meters, and long-range ember exposure at 500 meters from vegetation capable of producing those fire effects (Beverly et al., 2010). This helps districts and residents understand where homes are most likely to ignite from wildfire and where defensible space and home hardening practices should be highest priority.

Robust spatial analysis can predict where fire is likely to occur and how intense it is likely to be. This information, in coordination with local stakeholder input, really shows where priorities are on the landscape and where implementation is possible.

With these additions to the CWPP process, we hope to influence more effective wildfire mitigation and continue to develop new strategies to aid human and ecological communities in becoming fire adapted. In future articles, we will discuss strategies to improve community engagement and solidify actionable mitigation planning.

Recent Posts

By Aidan Juhl April 16, 2026
Written by Colleen Robinson
April 14, 2026
Written by Shannon Maes
April 14, 2026
In September 2025, the Guild launched a three-person Forest Stewards Apprenticeship (FSA) crew to work with the Penobscot Nation’s Department of Natural Resources (PN DNR). Over the course of their six-month season, apprentices Agenor Duhon, Gabe Stewart, and Jacob Baker shared a season of learning, collaboration, and hands-on stewardship of Penobscot Tribal lands.
April 14, 2026
This week, I stepped into the role of crew leader. We worked a full 40-hour week, splitting our time between Clifton Farms and a prescribed burn operation. On the first day in the field, we completed hack-and-squirt treatments on trees that had been marked the previous week. For the remainder of the week, we focused on marking trees for future hack-and-squirt work, maintaining a steady pace and ensuring accuracy in our selections.
April 7, 2026
As Guild members, our practice is fundamentally grounded in field observation. We know intuitively that forests are dynamic, living communities. Yet, for decades, the high-level systems used to value our work, specifically the carbon accounting ledgers tied to international frameworks like the Paris Agreement, have treated forests as static, quantifiable blocks of land. In a recent commentary published in One Earth, I argue that these legacy measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) frameworks are failing. Ledger accounting relies on crude land-use delineations and outdated technology, effectively penalizing the natural, seasonal flux of the ecosystems we manage every day. By forcing landscapes into rigid “forest” versus “non-forest” binaries, such legacy systems miss the complex reality on the ground. But a major shift is underway.
March 18, 2026
Women have always been a part of forestry. Historically, women often helped guide family decisions about when to cut, which trees to save, and how best to steward their land for the next generation. Historical accounts from the Southern Appalachians describe women’s roles in decisions about timber harvesting and prioritizing long-term forest health. These often-uncredited contributions are even reflected in Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac (1949), in which describes his stewardship philosophy informed not only by his professional experience, but by shared responsibility, where the perspectives of his wife and daughters played an important role.
March 18, 2026
Although rural regions often host the highest concentrations of public and private forest land, they typically lack the sustainable workforce necessary for active management and stewardship. How do we address this foundational problem in forest conservation?
March 18, 2026
The Forest Stewards Guild has a unique dual mandate: practice and promote forest stewardship. Personally, I think the combination of practicing forest management and promoting best practices is what makes the Guild a vibrant and impactful organization.
February 17, 2026
We celebrate the remarkable career and legacy of Leslie (Les) Benedict, who has provided visionary leadership and dedicated service to the stewardship of forests, championing the preservation of the ecological and culturally important black ash. Benedict, a member of the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe in Akwesasne, north of the Adirondacks in upstate New York, recently retired after serving as the Assistant Director of the Tribe’s Environment Division for over 35 years.
February 17, 2026
The Forest Stewards Guild has been working to support the National Park Service on forest stewardship projects throughout the eastern U.S. This month we are in the midst of a project to protect mounds at Effigy Mounds National Monument near Harpers Ferry Iowa. This site was designated as a National Monument in 1949 and preserves over 200 mounds built between 800 and 2,500 years ago. Mounds at this site include conical, linear, compound, and effigy mounds – constructed in the shape of animals. Please see the National Park Service page for more information about the mounds, the people who built them, and how to visit the site. The lidar images on that website of the Marching Bears and other mound groups are fascinating.
Show More